Consolidating exhibition installation

installation-sketch-2.jpg
March – sketch for exhibition installation

The sketch on the left was produced last month and shared in the March crit. In discussion with the group and Les there was a feeling that the large seaweed pigment works and split screen projection could work alone. Les questioned whether the other elements were necessary or merely describing the rest of the work.

Since this point I have moved away from using a large scale projection and large scale work in favour of creating a more intimate collection, an accumulation of smaller pieces. My tutorial with Michele Whiting on 1st April was really useful in getting me to address the form of installation I am creating. I had presented the idea of using a neat grid and shelf (as sent to The Civic and signed off by the other tutors):-

Installation sketch 3

There is something neat, orderly and clinical in the above arrangement. Michele commented on the significance of the grid as a form of taxonomy and how I had not really addressed this in my blog and that it required research and inclusion in my essay. She also redirected me to Mark Dion’s work on collecting and museology (I had researched his work in Year 1), pointing out that his process was highly relevant to the work. Michele questioned whether I want to create something that can be neatly contained and appears to be finished, or something which provokes more questions, is hard to contain and is inherently ‘slippery’ and unfinished. To quote Michele’s comments from my notes:

But one of the valuable parts of the process, the experimentation, repeat visits, understanding place, ways of looking and working. To make this explicit have to grasp that all the processes are the work. Argument for making the process and research explicit. Think about how the women collecting seaweed collated their albums, went every day, made drawings, recorded the seaweed, pressed seaweed – I’m doing the same. The grid can still come into it, look back at Mark Dion’s work – collecting the material was part of the work.

The above comments made sense to me, my project has been an ongoing process of collecting, processing, responding. As with Dion who reveals and unpicks the processes of collecting and also reveals the workings behind the scenes of museums and archives, I could also make my process of collecting and selection explicit.

https://glasstire.com/2018/07/24/amon-carter-to-present-installation-by-mark-dion-in-2020/ (accessed April 5th 2019) In the above work, Dion is retracing the journeys of 19th century Texan explorers. There is a sense in which I am retracing, not the journeys but the processes, of my seaweed collecting ancestor and other seaweed collectors/ phycologists, including Amelia Griffiths, Mary Wyatt, Margaret Gatty and Anna Atkins.

 

Making the maquette above was a useful process and helped me to visual the installation and consider the layout. It has been confirmed that I have a long wall and corner in The Civic so the installation might not be in a straight line. I was thinking of representing a taxonomy in the arrangement of work on paper (as in the maquette above), starting with poured ink images of each of the main types of seaweed at the top and getting gradually smaller. I think this is a bit too neat and contained so I will vary the sizes and arrangement to add more variety and make it appear more informal/ personal.

Dion’s installations are highly detailed and thought through, they are convincing – putting us in the shoes of an explorer/ collector. His work focuses on the taxonomy and categorisation used in museums and archives. He predominantly works within institutions and responds to their collections. His work is also playful and often making an environmental point and holding a spotlight to our approach to the environment and collecting. “Mark Dion approaches history with both humor and respect while embodying the artist-explorer experience in modern times. He is able to push the boundaries of what a normal exhibition looks like, but still makes it accessible to a wide audience by creating a sense of wonder.” Margaret C. Adler, curator at The Amon Carter Museum of American Art in Fort Worth. https://glasstire.com/2018/07/24/amon-carter-to-present-installation-by-mark-dion-in-2020/ (accessed April 5th 2019) In the above work, Dion is retracing the journeys of 19th century Texan explorers. There is a sense in which I am retracing, not the journeys but the processes, of my seaweed collecting ancestor and other seaweed collectors/ phycologists, including Amelia Griffiths, Mary Wyatt, Margaret Gatty and Anna Atkins.

Following the discussion with Michele about revealing the research and processes I tried out a mock up for the exhibition in my studio today (above). The space is not quite as big as the space I’ve been allocated in the gallery. I sourced a bureau desk on Ebay – as a  desk represents research more than the shelf that I had showed in my proposal, it also provides the opportunity for the viewer to look more closely, reveals more of the process. The desk will include seaweed and ink samples, my sketchbook with pigment tests and notes, and examples of pressed seaweed.

The above comments made sense to me, my project has been an ongoing process of collecting, processing, responding. As with Dion who reveals and unpicks the processes of collecting and also reveals the workings behind the scenes of museums and archives, I could also make my process of collecting and selection explicit.

Mark-Dion-department-of-marine-animal-identification-installation
Mark Dion, Department of Marine Animal Identification of the City of San Francisco (Chinatown Division), 1998/2010, Mixed media

Dion’s installations are highly detailed and thought through, they are convincing – putting us in the shoes of an explorer/ collector. His work focuses on the taxonomy and categorisation used in museums and archives. He predominantly works within institutions and responds to their collections. His work is also playful and often making an environmental point and holding a spotlight to our approach to the environment and collecting. “Mark Dion approaches history with both humor and respect while embodying the artist-explorer experience in modern times. He is able to push the boundaries of what a normal exhibition looks like, but still makes it accessible to a wide audience by creating a sense of wonder.” Margaret C. Adler, curator at The Amon Carter Museum of American Art in Fort Worth. https://glasstire.com/2018/07/24/amon-carter-to-present-installation-by-mark-dion-in-2020/ (accessed April 5th 2019) In the above work, Dion is retracing the journeys of 19th century Texan explorers. There is a sense in which I am retracing, not the journeys but the processes, of my seaweed collecting ancestor and other seaweed collectors/ phycologists, including Amelia Griffiths, Mary Wyatt, Margaret Gatty and Anna Atkins.

Michele encouraged me to create a scale maquette to test out the form and scale of the installation:

 

 

‘The effort to organise and explain the world’s copious and strange complexity is the desire underlying the Wunderkammer – but equally evident is the desire to luxuriate in what cannot be understood. Even if we have, today, split apart the scientific from the artistic, the Wunderkammer reminds us that the two are both essentially forms of taking pleasure in the task of understanding the world, provoked by a stimulating object or idea.’ Obrist, H. and Raza, A. (n.d.). Ways of curating. (2014). UK: Penguin Random House. p.42

 

 

Work on paper – there will be quite a lot of variety in terms of scale and materials/ processes. This fits with the idea of it being a personal collection and – as with the seaweed albums at the RAMM archive, several types of paper were used, depending on availability and wealth of the collector.

I have hung the work on paper from twine – again, an alteration from my proposal, there will also be a larger number of pieces of varied scale, with a slightly more jumbled appearance than in the photos. The work on paper represents the different approaches that I have taken in my research, it also reveals my personal response to the material.

I testing out different ways that I could show my film, one thought was to show it in one of the drawers of a small apothercarie’s chest that I own (middle image in top row). I like this idea – in particular with the drawer being partially opened, the viewer has to pull it open. It doesn’t work on the plinth I have shown in the photo, it’s too high here, might work better on a side table. Alternatively I could use a plinth, as in right hand image on top row – perhaps rather than having an aperture cut out of the front I would cut one out of the top so that the viewer is peering down into it, as you would into a rock pool. TBC. I will probably need to get this fabricated by a CNC cutter if I go for the plinth option to make it look really crisp.

Michele suggested I read Hans Ulrich’s Ways of Curating and Claire Bishop’s Installation Art to help develop my understanding of the history and context, as well as opportunities and implications of particular forms of installation art. I found Ulrich’s writing particularly enjoyable and relevant – he comments on a conversation between Umberto Eco and Jean-Claude Carriere ‘during which they discuss archives, the writers say that everything they’ve thought about such collections started with their childhood’. Obrist, H. and Raza, A. (n.d.). Ways of curating. (2014). UK: Penguin Random House.p.46This chimes with my experience of seaweed collecting, with photos and stories of me digging around in rockpools and seaweed aged five. Another quote by Ulrich especially attracted my attention:

‘The effort to organise and explain the world’s copious and strange complexity is the desire underlying the Wunderkammer – but equally evident is the desire to luxuriate in what cannot be understood. Even if we have, today, split apart the scientific from the artistic, the Wunderkammer reminds us that the two are both essentially forms of taking pleasure in the task of understanding the world, provoked by a stimulating object or idea.’ Obrist, H. and Raza, A. (n.d.). Ways of curating. (2014). UK: Penguin Random House. p.42

 

 

tumblr_locjfcQwdN1qd8kego1_400Through writing my essay, and examining ideas of taxonomy, as well as the work of Mark Dion, I decided to add a ladder to my installation. This ‘Seaweed Collectors of The British Isles‘ ladder (pictured above) includes the names of the female collectors that I have researched – Amelia Griffiths, Mary Wyatt, Anna Atkins, Margaret Gatty, and my Great, Great Grandfather John Mann, whose album started off my investigation in the first place. This is not supposed to be a comprehensive list, but the figures who have shaped my enquiry. I have written their names and dates on each rung. Dion’s Scala Naturae, (1994). The ladder is a metaphor for ordering and in my work for change/ revision as there is an implicit invitation to the viewer to climb it and move the installation. It is also intended to suggest the ongoing nature of collecting and ordering.

The form of my installation has evolved, through discussion, research and my making. I hope that it now invites more participation and engagment from the viewer than my earlier proposal and presents a questioning and curious collection. I imagine it will provoke a range of responses in the viewer. Primarily I aspire to invite a sensory and personal response and create discussion around collecting, observation of nature, materials, ephemerality vs permanence, and the role of the female collector.

 

 

Exhibition maquette

I had some fun creating this maquette for the exhibition. I have decided that the works on paper will start with 3 (almost A1 size) on the top row – these will have a poured image of the seaweed ink each representing one of the three main types of seaweed, red, green and brown. The following rows, as mentioned in the previous post will be showing one of the approaches I have used, eg gestural printing with the seaweed ink, Jurassic mud and seaweed combined. This represents my personal/ experiential taxonomy of seaweed.

There is one more possible element in the installation which is a wooden ladder, this would have seaweed hanging from it to dry and have the names of female seaweed collectors painted on the rungs – a pantheon.

Tutorial with Michele Whiting 1.4.2019

I found this tutorial thought provoking and challenging, I came out of it in many ways less certain about the work I am producing than when it started! Though this is not in many ways a bad thing as I feel I have been provoked to question my work more deeply and consider how I can articulate my ideas and also be ambitious in my exhibition. Whilst aware that there is some time pressure and an evident need to resolve work for the exhibition, Michele encouraged me to still develop my work further. Particular areas we discussed were the presentation/ installation, I am using the language of the museum in my installation and could push this further. Create my own taxonomy. Do not feel that I need to present just one, polished outcome, present the research and process behind the work. Michele encouraged me to return to the work of Mark Dion as a reference. All in all she was inviting/ challenging me to be ambitious – go for it with the installation, not be too safe and go for an overly neat (and potentially tentative solution). Notes below:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

We discussed the use of the grid – suggesting taxonomy, the aesthetic of the museum. How this is an artistic taxonomy, distinct from a scientific one, licence to play. Need to talk about museology in essay and blog with reference to texts.

Michele encouraged me to make a maquette to help me decide on scale etc of the installation – what do I need to keep in/ take out? Help to be specific about exact dimensions and format.

Michele felt that the use of the juraassic mud from the beach I’m collecting seaweed on and have been repeatedly visiting is appropriate – relates to the site, importance on place, ongoing investigation.

We discussed scale, I mentioned that I am undecided upon either a collection of smaller works of smaller number of large works. Michele commented on accumulation of images a way of creating scale/ impact.

Michele sketched the following Venn diagram which she suggested represents my work, this had a lot of resonance for me:

Venn diagram my work

Michele pointed out this approach allows for play. When I curate the work, what am I adding to the work, what am I taking away? Can think about more artistic gestural matters, what it means when I mix these materials together, what does this bring to the understanding and recording of the place, what does it mean to the place?

Bring sense of discovery – repeated action of going on walks and finding new things into the work, dealing with the familiar in an unfamiliar way.

Michelle mentioned the body of work she produced for her MA – slippery, unfinished, made film, drawing, cuttings, drew from them. Memory drawings, immersed herself. The editing is v significant.

Looking, seeing, noting. Writing, drawing, making. Drawing on site – directly from the seaweed, photograph, experience and write about it.

Film – liked split screen. Think about sound – needs to be watery. I could build a plinth (white) with a hole cut in for a monitor, think about the housing of it, quite a slim plinth, coming out of wall a bit, think about height, could have headphones. Film could text and voiceover. Also think about the speed of the pieces in the film – they’re ethereal, could draw this out, slow down, need to speak with the drawings.

Adobe premiere.

Can take time in an edit suite with an editor, makes an edit list with a time code.

3-5 mins max, what that work is doing individually and in relation to what I’m doing overall. Brings another connection.

Installation

Think about museology side of it – museums are places of learning. How do we learn? What I’m doing – saying there are other ways of learning, an artistic response we can learn from.

Scale – do I reach a scale through accumulation of these individual properties or do I make a large response, I need to resolve. Thinking about grid like formation – how do I disrupt that?

What kind of narrative am I curating? What devices can I use to present the ideas?

With maquette I can tweak ideas. – challenging museum display. How art, life, place interact with each other, how do I show that? Sense of a need to do this kind work in this society – what you’re doing can be packaged into another place, another set of experiences, ie a funded project. Where’s the longevity in it? Becomes a way of working/ vehicle. Local museum, have conversations, mention exhibition – could lead to residency. They’re most interested in impact, ie intimate knowledge of the seaweeeds, built on a history – eg albums, thinking about impact for learning, impact for adult audience, libraries. Environmental impact, visual knowledge, often overlooked in other disciplines.

The shelf: Is it a shelf or a desk, coming out from the wall which you can interact with, insinuating the idea of research into the space. Precedents – a space can be set up which has that immediacy, so even if the audience isn’t permitted to interact with it.

Value in being the person who takes the time out to observe/ record a specific space. Holds that bit of history.

Works you are making that you can then frame which can be put into the gallery white cube space. But one of the valuable parts of the process, the experimentation, repeat visits, understanding place, ways of looking and working. To make this explicit have to grasp that all the processes are the work. Michelle argues for making the process and research explicit. Think about how the women collecting seaweed collated their albums, went every day, made drawings, recorded the seaweed, pressed seaweed – I’m doing the same. The grid can still come into it, look back at Mark Dion’s work – collecting the material was part of the work.

Remind myself that I’m working at the forefront of my own knowledge, inherently uncomfortable – acknowledge that.

Reading:

Hans Obrist – ways of curating.

 

PPP tutorial 1.4.2019

Claudia Dharamshi MA3 PPP outline

I found this tutorial helpful – firstly Caroline confirmed that I’m on the right lines with my PPP, it just needs tweaking which is a relief. We had a useful talk about future plans, she helped me to be less black and white about the potential of earning money as an artist and making meaningful work, continuing with the art practice that I have been developing on the MA e.g. working with archives. She pointed out the potential to work with communities, curators, museums. We also discussed ways to extend and make the most out of work eg produce a book of my seaweed project.

Overall this discussion helped to confirm that the way forward is trying to create a portfolio approach to working as an artist, ie combining teaching, applying for funding, developing work/ working on commissions etc.

Notes from the tutorial are below:

  • Caroline felt that my draft PPP was fine and that the format was logical, I should add an introductory paragraph and also list the targets that I have previously set and met.
  • We discussed future career plans and potential for building on my MA body of work. The seaweed project could that become a publication. Etc.
  • More commercially: How do you maximise the use of one piece of work? Eg a painting can be reproduced, prints, postcards
  • How do we research things? – how do we find things out? – as a workshop. Try and widen thinking, not just about selling work.
  • Working with archives and collections, many possibilities, could include work with different communities and people, developing work I have previously done with communities.
  • Caroline thought that it was a positive thing that I am making more links with other artists, she suggested I should also develop connections with curators.
  • Think broadly about where the work will sit and making the most out of the work. Add links to own website etc.
  • Reading – The Allure of the Archive, Arlette Farge, talks about the archive having a holy grail attached to it, the discovery is in the process of gentle looking. Looking at these small discoveries, relevant to my work.

To do:

Add further detail to PPP plan, including appropriate links. Consider how I could further develop the work I am creating/ use a similar process in the future.